Mission Seal US Department of State
United States Mission to Germany flag graphic
 
U.S. Policy and Issues
Policy News
News from Washington
German-American Relations
U.S. Policy Texts in German (Amerika Dienst)
Receive Policy Texts by Email
InfoAlert
Latest Issue
International Security
>Transatlantic Relations
Trade & Economics
U.S. Politics & Government
Development
Environment
U.S. Society
U.S. Culture
InfoAlert Archive
Electronic Journals

InfoAlert

Transatlantic Relations

November 2005

German-American Relations | European Union | NATO |

German-American Relations

F1 - Germany and America: Can We Have a Global Transatlantic Agenda?
Bindenagel, J.D.
The American Institute for Contemporary German Studies, October 7, 2005, online edition
"Walter Russell Mead a year ago pointed out two basic truths about German-American relations: “First, a solid and stable relationship between the United States and Germany remains, as it has for more than half a century, the indispensable precondition for progress toward European integration. Second, the area now causing the greatest disputes between Germany and the United States – the Middle East – is the area in which the two countries have major interests in common, and where both stand to gain the most by finding their way to a cooperative path.”" J.D. Bindenagel is vice president of Community, Government, and International Affairs at DePaul University. Fulltext

European Union

F2 - The Future of Europe: Has European Integration Been a Success?
Jost, Kenneth
CQ Researcher, October 28, 2005, v15, #38, pp909-932
"Some 50 years ago, six nations joined in the first European federation. Now, with the addition of 10 nations in 2004, the European Union (EU) comprises 25 countries with a combined economy nearly equal to that of the United States and a population half again as large. EU supporters claim the Union has brought peace to the continent and spread prosperity by eliminating trade barriers. But further integration suffered a setback last spring when French and Dutch voters rejected the EU's proposed constitution. Opponents used the vote to register concerns about high unemployment, slow growth and increased immigration. Supporters said the constitution would have made the EU a more workable federation. With the constitution shelved for now, the EU faces another controversy: whether to admit predominantly Muslim Turkey." Kenneth Jost is ssociate editor at CQ Researcher. Order Article

F3 - The European Union is Dead
Hulsman, John C. and William L.T. Schirano
The National Interest, Fall 2005, #81, pp61-67
Given the empirical realities of no votes, the failure of the recent budget talks at the EU summit, and huge strains over enlargement, Europe is likely to remain static, not coherent enough to be either strongly pro- or anti-American. Hulsman and Schirano discuss the collapse of Europe's effort to unify individual countries and its implications on US-Europe relations.John C. Hulsman is senior research fellow in European affairs at the Heritage
Foundation. William L. T. Schirano is research assistant in foreign policy at the Heritage Foundation.
Fulltext

F4 - Europe’s Dream Disturbed
Black, Conrad
The National Interest, Fall 2005, #81, pp54-61
k discusses the rejection of the proposed European Union constitution. The first message of the French and Dutch rejection of the constitution it that those Europeans more interested in a common market and a high level of cooperation among states-but not the surrender of national sovereignty-have finally punctured the Euro-balloon that all Europe wanted to be emancipated from the straitjacket of national identity. Conrad Black is a member of the Advisory Council of The National Interest. Fulltext

F5 - Sustaining U.S.-European Global Security Cooperation
Flanagan, Stephen J.
National Defense University, Institute for National Strategic Studies, Strategic Forum, September 2005, #217, 6p.
”The atmosphere and tone of transatlantic discourse have improved markedly in recent months. Sustaining transatlantic security cooperation will require narrowing lingering European-American differences over threat perceptions, strategy, and military priorities. There is sufficient commonality of assessments and interests to fashion complementary European and American policies toward key challenges including countering terrorism and further proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD); promotion of Palestinian-Israeli reconciliation and reform in the wider Middle East; and relations with China, Russia, and Ukraine. Progress in these areas requires an enhanced transatlantic dialogue, particularly more systematic U.S.-European Union (EU) policy consultations, coupled with a mutual willingness to make policy adjustments. Stephen J. Flanagan is Director of the Institute for National Strategic Studies and Vice President for Research at the National Defense University. Fulltext

F6 - Europe Flees Economic and Political Reality
The American Enterprise, October-December 2005, v16, # 7, p18ff
A special section on Europe and the Transatlantic Relationship. A compilation of articles on economic, social and international issues, including:
- Endangered Europe
Zinsmeister, Karl
This article provides numbers and graphs as ”firsthand evidence on Europe’s sliding economic and social success.”
- The Euro-Economics Aren’t Working
Gersemann, Olaf
The economies of the major countries on the European continent are suffering with stagnation, unemployment, and low or no growth. Gersemann draws a transatlantic economic comparison and outlines that the American model includes economic policies that might work in Europe as well.
- America Still Beckons
Kotkin, Joel
”The American dream may be a musty old relic in the minds of some American elites. But to thousands of European immigrants each year, the dream still rings true.”
- Red, White, and Bruised
Dowd, Alan
”A brief history of anti-Americanism among European elites reveals that resentment toward the New World is as old as America itself. It certainly didn't begin on Bush's watch. And it won't end any time soon.”
- Europeans Go AWOL in the Terror War
Chesnoff, Richard, John Miller, and Mark Molesky.
In individual statements, the authors share their view explaining why ”Europeans have never done their share in the fight against Middle Eastern extremists.” Fulltext

F7 - A Theory of Corporate Scandals: Why the USA and Europe Differ

Coffee, Jr. John C.
Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Summer 2005, pp198-211
A wave of financial irregularity in the USA in 2001–2 culminated in the Sarbanes–Oxley Act. A worldwide stock market bubble burst over this same period, with the actual market decline being proportionately more severe in Europe. Yet, no corresponding wave of financial scandals involving a similar level of companies occurred in Europe. Given the higher level of public and private enforcement in the USA for securities fraud, this contrast seems perplexing. This paper submits that different kinds of scandals characterize different systems of corporate governance. John C. Coffee Jr. is Adolf A. Berle Professor of Law at Columbia University, New York. Order Article

NATO

F8 - European Defense Integration: Bridging the Gap Between Strategy and Capabilities
Flournoy, Michèle et al
The Center for Strategic and International Studies, October 2005, 99p.
"The report outlines concrete steps European nations should take in order to enhance their military capabilities to perform 21st century operations. It contains specific recommendations for national capitals, NATO, the European Union, the NATO-EU relationship - and addresses Europe’s relationship with the defense industry as well." Michèle A. Flournoy is senior adviser in the CSIS International Security Program.
Fulltext


back to top ^

United States Mission